Tag Archives: schulz

Tony Frontier Says We Must Use AI, and Use It with “Intention”

Artificial intelligence, or “AI,” is not new. For years, our students have been using forms of what is called “narrow AI.” Maybe the best example of narrow AI is adaptive learning software, in which the technology provides personalized reading and math instruction and practice.

But generative AI products such as Google Gemini are now available. And the interest in the use of these products has exploded—especially among our students—and this school year may become the “AI moment” when this all comes together.

Except educators have tended to view the challenge of AI as figuring out how to keep students from not using it. So when students take on traditional assignments such as research papers, we tend to be concerned they will use AI to “cheat” on the assignment. And much of our energy involving AI has been devoted to blocking its use.

In his new book “AI with Intention: Principles and Action Steps for Teachers and School Leaders” Tony Frontier takes the opposite viewpoint. He urges educators to not only put AI to work in improving our students’ learning, but to do this “with intention”—to work hard to ensure that our use of AI is being effective in helping our kids learn in new and more powerful ways.

Yet to put AI to work in an effective way requires considerable change, and that is what “AI with Intention” is about. Frontier devotes the book to discussing how we can bring about the changes needed to help our students use AI more effectively.

He splits the book into two sections. The first half of the book is devoted to advice for school leaders on how to bring about the needed change. And the second half is devoted to advice for teachers.

How can school leaders provide leadership to effectively implement AI?

Frontier begins his advice for school leaders by suggesting that they “lead by learning.” He urges leaders to help all those in the organization understand the basics of how AI works and what it can do. For example, he advises leaders to help people avoid “anthropomorphizing” AI—to treat AI like it is a human, as in science fiction movies. He uses the example of the student telling the teacher that, “Google told me this.” No, AI is a tool that we use, not a person.

He then urges leaders to “take a transformational approach.” A key issue for leaders in implementing AI is recognizing the distinction between transactional and transformational change. An example of transactional change would be replacing an outdated textbook. And of course this kind of change is often needed.

But to get the greatest benefit from AI, Frontier encourages school leaders to work to bring about transformational change—to change how our students learn in a basic way. He says leaders must “Ask big, transformational questions—those that challenge long-held assumptions, invite new ways of thinking about the nature of the work at hand, and help others break free from the past.”

Although Frontier argues we must move past viewing AI as a way students might cheat, he calls on us to “emphasize integrity.” He recognizes that we must manage academic integrity, and he talks quite a bit about this.

And Frontier advises that we must put “fidelity before efficiency.” He cautions about using AI to achieve efficiency without “fidelity” to the larger goal of ensuring that our students have a rich learning experience.

How can teachers use AI to help our kids learn? How can we use AI with “intention?”

To begin his discussion of how teachers can use AI to improve how students learn, Tony encourages teachers to “stand in their shoes,” and view AI abilities as our students do.

He then calls on teachers to “know your purpose.” A very enlightening discussion is his contrast between the “culture of compliance,” in which our energy is directed to issues such as did our students submit their assignments, and the “culture of learning,” where the focus is on what might our students learn and whether this is happening.

He asks teachers to “prompt AI tools intentionally” and “use AI tools for intentional learning,” to ensure that AI tools are being used with intention and to help our students to become independent learners.

There’s more to do

 “AI with Intention” is a great contribution to understanding the role AI can play in our kids’ learning experience, how we can implement AI effectively, and how we can avoid some dangers of its use.

But there are things “AI with Intention” doesn’t do:

  • It doesn’t review specific AI tools.
  • It focuses on the use of generative AI tools such as Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot, and it doesn’t open the door to even scarier tools such as AI tutors (e.g., Khanmigo).
  • Although it provides examples, these examples tend to relate to older kids.
  • It doesn’t provide a sample action plan for implementing AI.
  • And it doesn’t provide case studies on AI implementations in real districts and schools.

This is not a criticism of the book. “AI with Intention” provides a rich review of the issues involved in ensuring that AI is used “with intention.”

But there’s more to do. To begin, we need to consider how our districts and schools can structure their efforts to use AI and other methods to transform how learning happens with their kids. And we need to check out the actual experience of our fellow districts in how they are successfully or possibly not-so-successfully implementing AI.

And this is where you can help. Have you used AI “with intention” to help your students learn more effectively? If so, don’t be shy—this is the AI moment! This is the time to stand up and tell your story of success, to help all of us make the transformation in learning our kids need, as we enter the age of AI.

Virtual Learning Will Make the New Normal Better. But We Must Still Value Our Human Interactions.

The New York Times recently ran two articles with different opinions on the value of virtual learning.

In his February 15th article on “Lessons from Virtual Kindergarten,” [i] David Saks talked about how his four-year-old son Kyle will benefit from a return to face-to-face kindergarten.

But in his February 16th article on “I Actually Like Teaching on Zoom,” [ii] Viet Thanh Nguyen argued that continuing the changes brought about by the pandemic will enable his college students to learn more effectively.

They’re both right.

Three things happened to us during the pandemic.

We needed to make more use of technology and tools, and we did. We acquired new devices and other technology.

We all acquired new technology skills, even four-year-olds like Kyle.

And our culture changed. We began interacting in new ways at work, at school, and at home.

We would be wise to realize these are transformative changes. We need to proactively manage them to get their benefits but also to avoid the downsides. Our technology tools can help us to be more productive and connect better with each other. And we can benefit from our experience with virtual learning during the pandemic.

But we also need to cherish all that was best about the old normal—we must be especially vigilant not to let our alluring technology diminish our ability to have normal human interactions. And how this works will vary depending on the age of the humans involved.

Mr. Saks was right on the money regarding Kyle—four-year-old children need intense human interaction, and their screen time, although somewhat inevitable today, needs to be carefully controlled.

Professor Nguyen’s college students are towards the other end of the education age spectrum. They grew up with screens, and they can benefit from virtual learning in some ways. But whether we’re four or one hundred and four, we need to prioritize those face-to-face human interactions.


[i]    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/15/opinion/kindergarten-remote-learning-covid.html.

[ii]   https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/15/opinion/zoom-video-school-teaching.html#:~:text=And%20much%20is%20horrible%3A%20teachers,the%20human%20connection%20attenuated%20online